Cheryl Jan 21 2026 at 4:41AM on page 188
Answer
A segment of my neighborhood was developed 2015-2020-ish and I researched their sales prices were $422K- $1M. The developer destroyed prime forested lands, parts of a deer wintering area and Class II and Class III wetlands and violated stormwater permit conditions in order to build these McMansions on tree-bereft vast green yards. Give us a break- these prices do not represent the environmental costs we have to pay, do not represent what is being cranked out here locally. (Wondering are you including dilapidated "fixer-uppers" to lower the median $?) We bought our home in 2003 for nearly 1/2 the price and the quality/ longevity of its structure and stability within its environs is far better in comparison to the new builds. Someone is raking in major $s off of selling what I call lemons: homes on properties that are going to experience extreme soil erosion because they were once forested, on soils that are not supportive of grass lawn, that now require tons of fertilizer to maintain green lawns and (if ever discontinued or if weather conditions change), soil erosion and stormwater will become unmanageable. But they've sold us on "it's good for the economy and we're fulfilling "affordable housing" stock -because these wealthy landowners can manipulate (via the white male buddy network and the current drive to build, build, build) the local governing system so that it passively allows any building to occur- even where it should not take place. We all see this and know this to be true.
Comments
View all Cancel